↓ Skip to main content

Soft Substrates Promote Homogeneous Self-Renewal of Embryonic Stem Cells via Downregulating Cell-Matrix Tractions

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
279 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
304 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Soft Substrates Promote Homogeneous Self-Renewal of Embryonic Stem Cells via Downregulating Cell-Matrix Tractions
Published in
PLOS ONE, December 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0015655
Pubmed ID
Authors

Farhan Chowdhury, Yanzhen Li, Yeh-Chuin Poh, Tamaki Yokohama-Tamaki, Ning Wang, Tetsuya S. Tanaka

Abstract

Maintaining undifferentiated mouse embryonic stem cell (mESC) culture has been a major challenge as mESCs cultured in Leukemia Inhibitory Factor (LIF) conditions exhibit spontaneous differentiation, fluctuating expression of pluripotency genes, and genes of specialized cells. Here we show that, in sharp contrast to the mESCs seeded on the conventional rigid substrates, the mESCs cultured on the soft substrates that match the intrinsic stiffness of the mESCs and in the absence of exogenous LIF for 5 days, surprisingly still generated homogeneous undifferentiated colonies, maintained high levels of Oct3/4, Nanog, and Alkaline Phosphatase (AP) activities, and formed embryoid bodies and teratomas efficiently. A different line of mESCs, cultured on the soft substrates without exogenous LIF, maintained the capacity of generating homogeneous undifferentiated colonies with relatively high levels of Oct3/4 and AP activities, up to at least 15 passages, suggesting that this soft substrate approach applies to long term culture of different mESC lines. mESC colonies on these soft substrates without LIF generated low cell-matrix tractions and low stiffness. Both tractions and stiffness of the colonies increased with substrate stiffness, accompanied by downregulation of Oct3/4 expression. Our findings demonstrate that mESC self-renewal and pluripotency can be maintained homogeneously on soft substrates via the biophysical mechanism of facilitating generation of low cell-matrix tractions.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 304 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 295 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 86 28%
Researcher 66 22%
Student > Master 32 11%
Student > Bachelor 26 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 7%
Other 40 13%
Unknown 34 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 86 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 58 19%
Engineering 53 17%
Materials Science 20 7%
Chemistry 10 3%
Other 36 12%
Unknown 41 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2023.
All research outputs
#2,699,464
of 22,785,242 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#34,466
of 194,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,589
of 180,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#215
of 1,026 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,785,242 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,455 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,813 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,026 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.