↓ Skip to main content

Patterns of Loss and Regeneration of Tropical Dry Forest in Madagascar: The Social Institutional Context

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
300 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Patterns of Loss and Regeneration of Tropical Dry Forest in Madagascar: The Social Institutional Context
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2007
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0000402
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas Elmqvist, Markku Pyykönen, Maria Tengö, Fanambinantsoa Rakotondrasoa, Elisabeth Rabakonandrianina, Chantal Radimilahy

Abstract

Loss of tropical forests and changes in land-use/land-cover are of growing concern worldwide. Although knowledge exists about the institutional context in which tropical forest loss is embedded, little is known about the role of social institutions in influencing regeneration of tropical forests. In the present study we used Landsat images from southern Madagascar from three different years (1984, 1993 and 2000) and covering 5500 km(2), and made a time-series analysis of three distinct large-scale patterns: 1) loss of forest cover, 2) increased forest cover, and 3) stable forest cover. Institutional characteristics underlying these three patterns were analyzed, testing the hypothesis that forest cover change is a function of strength and enforcement of local social institutions. The results showed a minor decrease of 7% total forest cover in the study area during the whole period 1984-2000, but an overall net increase of 4% during the period 1993-2000. The highest loss of forest cover occurred in a low human population density area with long distances to markets, while a stable forest cover occurred in the area with highest population density and good market access. Analyses of institutions revealed that loss of forest cover occurred mainly in areas characterized by insecure property rights, while areas with well-defined property rights showed either regenerating or stable forest cover. The results thus corroborate our hypothesis. The large-scale spontaneous regeneration dominated by native endemic species appears to be a result of a combination of changes in precipitation, migration and decreased human population and livestock grazing pressure, but under conditions of maintained and well-defined property rights. Our study emphasizes the large capacity of a semi-arid system to spontaneously regenerate, triggered by decreased pressures, but where existing social institutions mitigate other drivers of deforestation and alternative land-use.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 300 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 3%
Brazil 6 2%
Germany 5 2%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Madagascar 3 1%
Sweden 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Other 7 2%
Unknown 261 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 62 21%
Researcher 61 20%
Student > Master 38 13%
Professor 25 8%
Other 20 7%
Other 64 21%
Unknown 30 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 108 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 103 34%
Social Sciences 24 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 13 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 2%
Other 11 4%
Unknown 35 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2022.
All research outputs
#7,756,853
of 23,578,176 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#95,632
of 201,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,822
of 73,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#83
of 128 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,578,176 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 201,811 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 73,132 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 128 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.