↓ Skip to main content

Therapy-related acute promyelocytic leukemia: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Oncology, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Therapy-related acute promyelocytic leukemia: a systematic review
Published in
Medical Oncology, June 2013
DOI 10.1007/s12032-013-0625-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Armin Rashidi, Stephen I. Fisher

Abstract

The incidence of therapy-related acute promyelocytic leukemia (t-APL) is apparently rising. We systematically reviewed the English literature until March 15, 2013, and collected a total of 326 t-APL cases, with the following results: (1) t-APL affects predominantly middle-aged adults with a median age at diagnosis of 47 years and a female-to-male ratio of 1.7:1; (2) after an incidence peak at 2 years following the completion of treatment for the primary antecedent disease, the risk of developing t-APL quickly diminishes with time; (3) the four most common primary antecedent conditions are breast cancer, hematological malignancies, multiple sclerosis, and genitourinary malignancies; (4) topoisomerase II inhibitors and radiation represent the most common potential risk factors; (5) despite different DNA damage "hot spot" sites, t-APL has no significant clinicopathologic differences from de novo APL (dn-APL); (6) t(15;17) is the sole cytogenetic abnormality in the vast majority of patients; (7) only a small minority of cases have a myelodysplastic or pancytopenic preleukemic phase; (8) more than one-third of patients come to medical attention incidentally (i.e., due to laboratory abnormalities), while the most common symptom is mucocutaneous bleeding, and 79 % have clinical DIC; and (9) the remission rate of t-APL is about 80 %, similar to dn-APL.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 4%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 54 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 12%
Student > Master 7 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Professor 3 5%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 18 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 18 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2016.
All research outputs
#7,453,126
of 22,785,242 outputs
Outputs from Medical Oncology
#255
of 1,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,961
of 197,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Oncology
#4
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,785,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,289 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,784 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.