↓ Skip to main content

The Good Behavior Game: A Best Practice Candidate as a Universal Behavioral Vaccine

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, December 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#10 of 399)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
17 news outlets
twitter
8 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
309 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Good Behavior Game: A Best Practice Candidate as a Universal Behavioral Vaccine
Published in
Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, December 2002
DOI 10.1023/a:1020977107086
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dennis D. Embry

Abstract

A "behavioral vaccine" provides an inoculation against morbidity or mortality, impacting physical, mental, or behavior disorders. An historical example of a behavioral vaccine is antiseptic hand washing to reduce childbed fever. In current society, issues with high levels of morbidity, such as substance abuse, delinquency, youth violence, and other behavioral disorders (multiproblems), cry out for a low-cost, widespread strategy as simple as antiseptic hand washing. Congruent research findings from longitudinal studies, twin studies, and other investigations suggest that a possibility might exist for a behavioral vaccine for multiproblem behavior. A simple behavioral strategy called the Good Behavior Game (GBG), which reinforces inhibition in a group context of elementary school, has substantial previous research to consider its use as a behavioral vaccine. The GBG is not a curriculum but rather a simple behavioral procedure from applied behavior analysis. Approximately 20 independent replications of the GBG across different grade levels, different types of students, different settings, and some with long-term follow-up show strong, consistent impact on impulsive, disruptive behaviors of children and teens as well as reductions in substance use or serious antisocial behaviors. The GBG, named as a "best practice" for the prevention of substance abuse or violent behavior by a number of federal agencies, is unique because it is the only practice implemented by individual teachers that is documented to have long-term effects. Presently, the GBG is only used in a small number of settings. However, near universal use of the GBG, in major political jurisdictions during the elementary years, could substantially reduce the incidence of substance use, antisocial behavior, and other adverse developmental or social consequences at a very modest cost, with very positive cost-effectiveness ratios.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 309 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 301 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 55 18%
Researcher 47 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 14%
Student > Bachelor 32 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 8%
Other 59 19%
Unknown 48 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 101 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 45 15%
Social Sciences 42 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 2%
Other 37 12%
Unknown 65 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 147. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2022.
All research outputs
#281,080
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
#10
of 399 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#348
of 135,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 399 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,790 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them