↓ Skip to main content

Mechanisms of action of docosahexaenoic acid in the nervous system

Overview of attention for article published in Lipids, September 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
patent
12 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
778 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
303 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mechanisms of action of docosahexaenoic acid in the nervous system
Published in
Lipids, September 2001
DOI 10.1007/s11745-001-0805-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Norman Salem, Burton Litman, Hee‐Yong Kim, Klaus Gawrisch

Abstract

This review describes (from both the animal and human literature) the biological consequences of losses in nervous system docosahexaenoate (DHA). It then concentrates on biological mechanisms that may serve to explain changes in brain and retinal function. Brief consideration is given to actions of DHA as a nonesterified fatty acid and as a docosanoid or other bioactive molecule. The role of DHA-phospholipids in regulating G-protein signaling is presented in the context of studies with rhodopsin. It is clear that the visual pigment responds to the degree of unsaturation of the membrane lipids. At the cell biological level, DHA is shown to have a protective role in a cell culture model of apoptosis in relation to its effects in increasing cellular phosphatidylserine (PS); also, the loss of DHA leads to a loss in PS. Thus, through its effects on PS, DHA may play an important role in the regulation of cell signaling and in cell proliferation. Finally, progress has been made recently in nuclear magnetic resonance studies to delineate differences in molecular structure and order in biomembranes due to subtle changes in the degree of phospholipid unsaturation.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 303 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 296 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 46 15%
Student > Master 46 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 15%
Student > Bachelor 37 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 28 9%
Other 59 19%
Unknown 42 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 94 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 35 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 32 11%
Neuroscience 20 7%
Psychology 14 5%
Other 50 17%
Unknown 58 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,696,282
of 22,785,242 outputs
Outputs from Lipids
#69
of 1,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,399
of 38,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lipids
#3
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,785,242 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,902 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 38,720 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.