↓ Skip to main content

Charophytes as a nutrient and energy reservoir in a tropical coastal lagoon impacted by humans (RJ, Brazil)

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Journal of Biology
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Charophytes as a nutrient and energy reservoir in a tropical coastal lagoon impacted by humans (RJ, Brazil)
Published in
Brazilian Journal of Biology
DOI 10.1590/s1519-69842004000300011
Authors

Palma-Silva, C., Albertoni, E. F., Esteves, F. A.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 17%
Unknown 19 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 30%
Student > Master 5 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Other 1 4%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 1 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 57%
Environmental Science 7 30%
Unknown 3 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2018.
All research outputs
#1,120,614
of 4,655,094 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Biology
#7
of 46 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,388
of 161,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Biology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,655,094 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 63rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 46 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one scored the same or higher as 39 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,030 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them