Title |
Efficient non-cytotoxic fluorescent staining of halophiles
|
---|---|
Published in |
Scientific Reports, February 2018
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41598-018-20839-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ivan Maslov, Andrey Bogorodskiy, Alexey Mishin, Ivan Okhrimenko, Ivan Gushchin, Sergei Kalenov, Norbert A. Dencher, Christoph Fahlke, Georg Büldt, Valentin Gordeliy, Thomas Gensch, Valentin Borshchevskiy |
Abstract |
Research on halophilic microorganisms is important due to their relation to fundamental questions of survival of living organisms in a hostile environment. Here we introduce a novel method to stain halophiles with MitoTracker fluorescent dyes in their growth medium. The method is based on membrane-potential sensitive dyes, which were originally used to label mitochondria in eukaryotic cells. We demonstrate that these fluorescent dyes provide high staining efficiency and are beneficial for multi-staining purposes due to the spectral range covered (from orange to deep red). In contrast with other fluorescent dyes used so far, MitoTracker does not affect growth rate, and remains in cells after several washing steps and several generations in cell culture. The suggested dyes were tested on three archaeal (Hbt. salinarum, Haloferax sp., Halorubrum sp.) and two bacterial (Salicola sp., Halomonas sp.) strains of halophilic microorganisms. The new staining approach provides new insights into biology of Hbt. salinarum. We demonstrated the interconversion of rod-shaped cells of Hbt. salinarium to spheroplasts and submicron-sized spheres, as well as the cytoplasmic integrity of giant rod Hbt. salinarum species. By expanding the variety of tools available for halophile detection, MitoTracker dyes overcome long-standing limitations in fluorescence microscopy studies of halophiles. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | 33% |
United States | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 2 | 67% |
Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 77 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 19% |
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 16% |
Researcher | 12 | 16% |
Student > Master | 10 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
Other | 6 | 8% |
Unknown | 17 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 22 | 29% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 16% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 9% |
Engineering | 5 | 6% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 4% |
Other | 4 | 5% |
Unknown | 24 | 31% |