You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Rapid Sound-Action Association Effect in Human Insular Cortex
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0000259 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Isabella Mutschler, Andreas Schulze-Bonhage, Volkmar Glauche, Evariste Demandt, Oliver Speck, Tonio Ball |
| Abstract |
Learning to play a musical piece is a prime example of complex sensorimotor learning in humans. Recent studies using electroencephalography (EEG) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) indicate that passive listening to melodies previously rehearsed by subjects on a musical instrument evokes differential brain activation as compared with unrehearsed melodies. These changes were already evident after 20-30 minutes of training. The exact brain regions involved in these differential brain responses have not yet been delineated. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Ethiopia | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 148 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 37 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 27 | 17% |
| Unknown | 20 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 41 | 26% |
| Neuroscience | 24 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 10% |
| Engineering | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 19 | 12% |
| Unknown | 27 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2017.
All research outputs
#7,453,126
of 22,785,242 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#88,756
of 194,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,083
of 75,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#110
of 151 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,785,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,455 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 75,926 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 151 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.