↓ Skip to main content

Light and Cognition: Roles for Circadian Rhythms, Sleep, and Arousal

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
48 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
349 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Light and Cognition: Roles for Circadian Rhythms, Sleep, and Arousal
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, February 2018
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2018.00056
Pubmed ID
Authors

Angus S. Fisk, Shu K. E. Tam, Laurence A. Brown, Vladyslav V. Vyazovskiy, David M. Bannerman, Stuart N. Peirson

Abstract

Light exerts a wide range of effects on mammalian physiology and behavior. As well as synchronizing circadian rhythms to the external environment, light has been shown to modulate autonomic and neuroendocrine responses as well as regulating sleep and influencing cognitive processes such as attention, arousal, and performance. The last two decades have seen major advances in our understanding of the retinal photoreceptors that mediate these non-image forming responses to light, as well as the neural pathways and molecular mechanisms by which circadian rhythms are generated and entrained to the external light/dark (LD) cycle. By contrast, our understanding of the mechanisms by which lighting influences cognitive processes is more equivocal. The effects of light on different cognitive processes are complex. As well as the direct effects of light on alertness, indirect effects may also occur due to disrupted circadian entrainment. Despite the widespread use of disrupted LD cycles to study the role circadian rhythms on cognition, the different experimental protocols used have subtly different effects on circadian function which are not always comparable. Moreover, these protocols will also disrupt sleep and alter physiological arousal, both of which are known to modulate cognition. Studies have used different assays that are dependent on different cognitive and sensory processes, which may also contribute to their variable findings. Here, we propose that studies addressing the effects of different lighting conditions on cognitive processes must also account for their effects on circadian rhythms, sleep, and arousal if we are to fully understand the physiological basis of these responses.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 349 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 349 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 15%
Student > Master 38 11%
Researcher 32 9%
Student > Bachelor 31 9%
Other 22 6%
Other 74 21%
Unknown 101 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 59 17%
Psychology 29 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 6%
Other 70 20%
Unknown 120 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2022.
All research outputs
#887,338
of 25,766,791 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#290
of 14,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,063
of 454,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#3
of 226 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,766,791 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,776 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,150 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 226 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.