↓ Skip to main content

Feeder-free growth of undifferentiated human embryonic stem cells

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Biotechnology, October 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
274 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1639 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
810 Mendeley
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Feeder-free growth of undifferentiated human embryonic stem cells
Published in
Nature Biotechnology, October 2001
DOI 10.1038/nbt1001-971
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chunhui Xu, Margaret S. Inokuma, Jerrod Denham, Kathaleen Golds, Pratima Kundu, Joseph D. Gold, Melissa K. Carpenter

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 810 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 1%
United Kingdom 6 <1%
France 3 <1%
Australia 3 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Other 8 <1%
Unknown 774 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 208 26%
Researcher 144 18%
Student > Master 117 14%
Student > Bachelor 68 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 49 6%
Other 118 15%
Unknown 106 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 323 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 145 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 67 8%
Engineering 55 7%
Neuroscience 16 2%
Other 73 9%
Unknown 131 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,030,479
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature Biotechnology
#2,894
of 8,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,694
of 46,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Biotechnology
#3
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,611 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 46,220 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.