↓ Skip to main content

Environmental factors can influence dengue reported cases

Overview of attention for article published in Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Environmental factors can influence dengue reported cases
Published in
Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira, November 2017
DOI 10.1590/1806-9282.63.11.957
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marco Antonio F. Carneiro, Beatriz da C. A. Alves, Flávia de Sousa Gehrke, José Nuno Domingues, Nelson Sá, Susana Paixão, João Figueiredo, Ana Ferreira, Cleonice Almeida, Amaury Machi, Eriane Savóia, Vânia Nascimento, Fernando Fonseca

Abstract

Global climate changes directly affect the natural environment and contribute to an increase in the transmission of diseases by vectors. Among these diseases, dengue is at the top of the list. The aim of our study was to understand the consequences of temporal variability of air temperature in the occurrence of dengue in an area comprising seven municipalities of the Greater São Paulo. Characterization of a temporal trend of the disease in the region between 2010 and 2013 was performed through analysis of the notified number of dengue cases over this period. Our analysis was complemented with meteorological (temperature) and pollutant concentration data (PM10). We observed that the months of January, February, March, April and May (from 2010 to 2013) were the ones with the highest number of notified cases. We also found that there is a statistical association of moisture and PM10 with the reported cases of dengue. Although the temperature does not statistically display an association with recorded cases of dengue, we were able to verify that temperature peaks coincide with dengue outbreak peaks. Future studies on environmental pollution and its influence on the development of Aedes aegypti mosquito during all stages of its life cycle, and the definition of strategies for better monitoring, including campaigns and surveillance, would be compelling.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 136 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 18%
Student > Bachelor 18 13%
Researcher 12 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Unspecified 4 3%
Other 22 16%
Unknown 47 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 16 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Other 22 16%
Unknown 55 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2018.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira
#807
of 1,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#299,290
of 340,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira
#13
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,105 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,775 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.