You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comprehensive geriatric care for patients with hip fractures: a prospective, randomised, controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(14)62409-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anders Prestmo, Gunhild Hagen, Olav Sletvold, Jorunn L Helbostad, Pernille Thingstad, Kristin Taraldsen, Stian Lydersen, Vidar Halsteinli, Turi Saltnes, Sarah E Lamb, Lars G Johnsen, Ingvild Saltvedt |
| Abstract |
Most patients with hip fractures are characterised by older age (>70 years), frailty, and functional deterioration, and their long-term outcomes are poor with increased costs. We compared the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of giving these patients comprehensive geriatric care in a dedicated geriatric ward versus the usual orthopaedic care. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 185 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 28 | 15% |
| United States | 18 | 10% |
| Norway | 16 | 9% |
| Spain | 8 | 4% |
| Canada | 7 | 4% |
| Ireland | 6 | 3% |
| Australia | 6 | 3% |
| Japan | 3 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 8% |
| Unknown | 76 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 115 | 62% |
| Scientists | 35 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 32 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 486 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Norway | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 475 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 67 | 14% |
| Other | 58 | 12% |
| Researcher | 47 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 44 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 42 | 9% |
| Other | 123 | 25% |
| Unknown | 105 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 218 | 45% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 46 | 9% |
| Psychology | 10 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 1% |
| Other | 49 | 10% |
| Unknown | 148 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 178. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2024.
All research outputs
#231,079
of 25,782,917 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#2,612
of 42,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,638
of 362,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#25
of 532 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,993 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,771 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 532 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.