You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Therapygenetics: Using genetic markers to predict response to psychological treatment for mood and anxiety disorders
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biology of Mood & Anxiety Disorders, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2045-5380-3-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kathryn J Lester, Thalia C Eley |
| Abstract |
Considerable variation is evident in response to psychological therapies for mood and anxiety disorders. Genetic factors alongside environmental variables and gene-environment interactions are implicated in the etiology of these disorders and it is plausible that these same factors may also be important in predicting individual differences in response to psychological treatment. In this article, we review the evidence that genetic variation influences psychological treatment outcomes with a primary focus on mood and anxiety disorders. Unlike most past work, which has considered prediction of response to pharmacotherapy, this article reviews recent work in the field of therapygenetics, namely the role of genes in predicting psychological treatment response. As this is a field in its infancy, methodological recommendations are made and opportunities for future research are identified. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 152 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 15% |
| Researcher | 21 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 29 | 18% |
| Unknown | 34 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 62 | 39% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Unknown | 50 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2016.
All research outputs
#2,197,666
of 22,786,087 outputs
Outputs from Biology of Mood & Anxiety Disorders
#16
of 66 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,719
of 283,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology of Mood & Anxiety Disorders
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,087 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 66 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,289 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.