↓ Skip to main content

Farming with crops and rocks to address global climate, food and soil security

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Plants, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#23 of 2,081)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
30 news outlets
blogs
11 blogs
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
341 X users
facebook
10 Facebook pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users
reddit
5 Redditors
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
249 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
221 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Farming with crops and rocks to address global climate, food and soil security
Published in
Nature Plants, February 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41477-018-0108-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

David J. Beerling, Jonathan R. Leake, Stephen P. Long, Julie D. Scholes, Jurriaan Ton, Paul N. Nelson, Michael Bird, Euripides Kantzas, Lyla L. Taylor, Binoy Sarkar, Mike Kelland, Evan DeLucia, Ilsa Kantola, Christoph Müller, Greg Rau, James Hansen

Abstract

The magnitude of future climate change could be moderated by immediately reducing the amount of CO2entering the atmosphere as a result of energy generation and by adopting strategies that actively remove CO2from it. Biogeochemical improvement of soils by adding crushed, fast-reacting silicate rocks to croplands is one such CO2-removal strategy. This approach has the potential to improve crop production, increase protection from pests and diseases, and restore soil fertility and structure. Managed croplands worldwide are already equipped for frequent rock dust additions to soils, making rapid adoption at scale feasible, and the potential benefits could generate financial incentives for widespread adoption in the agricultural sector. However, there are still obstacles to be surmounted. Audited field-scale assessments of the efficacy of CO2capture are urgently required together with detailed environmental monitoring. A cost-effective way to meet the rock requirements for CO2removal must be found, possibly involving the recycling of silicate waste materials. Finally, issues of public perception, trust and acceptance must also be addressed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 341 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 221 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 221 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 12%
Researcher 26 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 9%
Student > Bachelor 19 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 4%
Other 24 11%
Unknown 97 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 16%
Environmental Science 24 11%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 20 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 3%
Engineering 7 3%
Other 13 6%
Unknown 115 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 550. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 December 2022.
All research outputs
#44,865
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Nature Plants
#23
of 2,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,053
of 345,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Plants
#1
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,081 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 50.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,363 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.