↓ Skip to main content

On some results of M. I. Gordin: A clarification of a misunderstanding

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Theoretical Probability, April 1988
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 112)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
On some results of M. I. Gordin: A clarification of a misunderstanding
Published in
Journal of Theoretical Probability, April 1988
DOI 10.1007/bf01046930
Authors

Richard C. Bradley

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 33%
Lecturer 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 2 67%
Unknown 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2023.
All research outputs
#7,737,238
of 23,532,144 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Theoretical Probability
#4
of 112 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,748
of 13,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Theoretical Probability
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,532,144 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 112 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 13,345 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them