↓ Skip to main content

Fluorescent cell-based sensing approaches for toxicity testing

Overview of attention for article published in Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fluorescent cell-based sensing approaches for toxicity testing
Published in
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, April 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00216-010-3651-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Fritzsche, Carl-Fredrik Mandenius

Abstract

Fluorimetric cell-based sensing methods have attracted increasing interest in toxicity testing of pharmaceuticals, pathogens, environmental pollutants, and other chemicals. The objective of this review is to summarise the variety of approaches reported up to now and to present recent developments in this area. The different approaches are described in relation to their underlying mechanism and, especially, to the role of the fluorophore involved. The methods discussed include the use of fluorescent or fluorogenic indicators, fluorescence-based testing for membrane integrity, approaches based on fluorescence labelling, inducible fluorescent protein expression, and analysis of cellular autofluorescence. Several of these approaches have been shown to be advantageous in comparison with non-fluorescence methods and have potential in high-throughput screening, for example in drug discovery and safety pharmacology.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 69 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 28%
Student > Master 12 17%
Researcher 10 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 13 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 19%
Engineering 10 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 13%
Chemistry 8 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 7%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 15 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2024.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#2,202
of 9,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,291
of 103,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#27
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,619 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,518 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.