↓ Skip to main content

Relaxed impact craters on Ganymede: Regional variation and high heat flows

Overview of attention for article published in ICARUS, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Relaxed impact craters on Ganymede: Regional variation and high heat flows
Published in
ICARUS, May 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.icarus.2018.01.012
Authors

Kelsi N. Singer, Michael T. Bland, Paul M. Schenk, William B. McKinnon

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 50%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2018.
All research outputs
#7,867,275
of 12,538,691 outputs
Outputs from ICARUS
#2,486
of 3,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,665
of 271,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ICARUS
#41
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,538,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,034 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,236 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.