↓ Skip to main content

Rupturas e continuidades biográficas nas experiências e trajetórias familiares de crianças com fibrose cística

Overview of attention for article published in Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rupturas e continuidades biográficas nas experiências e trajetórias familiares de crianças com fibrose cística
Published in
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, February 2018
DOI 10.1590/1413-81232018232.16252017
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcelo Eduardo Pfeiffer Castellanos, Nelson Filice de Barros, Sandra Straccialano Coelho

Abstract

Biographical disruption (BD) became a core concept of sociological studies on the chronic illness experience by showing how this event can be strongly affected by ruptures in the ways of living and organizing the biographical trajectory through narratives. Critical reviews have pointed out that the widespread use of this concept was not sufficiently attentive to its analytical limits, e.g. addressing experiences of children with genetic diseases, when biographic flows (BF) rather than BD would be probably found. In this paper, we employed the concepts of BD and BF to analyze the relationships between the illness trajectories of children with cystic fibrosis (CF) and the experiences of their parents, taking into account the narratives about their histories and family contexts, drawn from semi-structured interviews with 10 children with CF and 14 family members. The results pointed to potentialities and limits of the concepts of BD and BF for the analysis undertaken in this study. We conclude that both concepts can be applied to the analysis of family experience involving child genetic diseases, provided that this occurs in a critical and sensitive way to subjects and contexts investigated, keeping in mind the more broader theoretical concerns.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 3 16%
Student > Master 3 16%
Student > Postgraduate 2 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 6 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 6 32%
Social Sciences 3 16%
Psychology 2 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 5 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2018.
All research outputs
#6,588,668
of 25,380,089 outputs
Outputs from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#351
of 2,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,790
of 447,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#3
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,380,089 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,034 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,262 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.