↓ Skip to main content

A positive selection for mutants lacking orotidine-5′-phosphate decarboxylase activity in yeast: 5-fluoro-orotic acid resistance

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Genetics and Genomics, November 1984
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#37 of 3,318)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
59 patents
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
613 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A positive selection for mutants lacking orotidine-5′-phosphate decarboxylase activity in yeast: 5-fluoro-orotic acid resistance
Published in
Molecular Genetics and Genomics, November 1984
DOI 10.1007/bf00330984
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jef D. Boeke, Francois La Croute, Gerald R. Fink

Abstract

Mutations at the URA3 locus of Saccharomyces cerevisiae can be obtained by a positive selection. Wild-type strains of yeast (or ura3 mutant strains containing a plasmid-borne URA3+ gene) are unable to grow on medium containing the pyrimidine analog 5-fluoro-orotic acid, whereas ura3- mutants grow normally. This selection, based on the loss of orotidine-5'-phosphate decarboxylase activity seems applicable to a variety of eucaryotic and procaryotic cells.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 613 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 5 <1%
United States 4 <1%
Netherlands 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Albania 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 588 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 159 26%
Researcher 96 16%
Student > Bachelor 92 15%
Student > Master 83 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 4%
Other 80 13%
Unknown 80 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 271 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 178 29%
Immunology and Microbiology 14 2%
Chemistry 13 2%
Engineering 10 2%
Other 35 6%
Unknown 92 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2023.
All research outputs
#2,759,744
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Genetics and Genomics
#37
of 3,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#335
of 9,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Genetics and Genomics
#1
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,318 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 9,110 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.