↓ Skip to main content

Nocturia, Sleep-Disordered Breathing, and Cardiovascular Morbidity in a Community-Based Cohort

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nocturia, Sleep-Disordered Breathing, and Cardiovascular Morbidity in a Community-Based Cohort
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0030969
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sairam Parthasarathy, MaryPat Fitzgerald, James L. Goodwin, Mark Unruh, Stefano Guerra, Stuart F. Quan

Abstract

Nocturia has been independently associated with cardiovascular morbidity and all-cause mortality, but such studies did not adjust for sleep-disordered breathing (SDB), which may have mediated such a relationship. Our aims were to determine whether an association between nocturia and cardiovascular morbidity exists that is independent of SDB. We also determined whether nocturia is independently associated with SDB.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 83 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 15%
Researcher 9 11%
Other 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 10%
Student > Master 8 10%
Other 18 21%
Unknown 20 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 8%
Neuroscience 5 6%
Computer Science 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 27 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2017.
All research outputs
#6,413,376
of 22,786,087 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#77,135
of 194,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,732
of 248,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#993
of 3,373 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,087 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,503 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,164 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,373 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.