↓ Skip to main content

Geographic variation in the life history of the sagebrush lizard: the role of thermal constraints on activity

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, November 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Geographic variation in the life history of the sagebrush lizard: the role of thermal constraints on activity
Published in
Oecologia, November 2004
DOI 10.1007/s00442-004-1767-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael W. Sears

Abstract

Thermal constraints on the time available for activity have been proposed as a proximate mechanism to explain variation in suites of life history traits. The longer that an ectotherm can maintain activity, the more time it has to forage and the greater chance that it will encounter a predator and be eaten. Thus, the thermal environment may produce a trade off between growth and survival when variation in the environment favors increased activity. I used mark-recapture data from a demographic study of three natural populations of the sagebrush lizard (Sceloporus graciosus) and estimates of thermal opportunity for each population to evaluate whether variation in the thermal environment can explain patterns of growth and survival that occur over an elevational gradient. Lizards from the highest elevation population exhibited higher individual growth rates than those of lizards from lower elevation, while mortality rates increased with elevation for these populations. The covariation of fast growth and high mortality with increased thermal opportunity is the opposite trend expected if the thermal environment alone is to explain patterns of life history in these lizards. Additional factors including thermal heterogeneity in the distribution of microhabitats of lizards, adaptation to local environmental conditions, and a potential trade-off between resource acquisition and predation risk need to be addressed to obtain a satisfactory explanation of the causative mechanisms producing life history variation.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
Brazil 3 2%
Spain 3 2%
Argentina 2 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 114 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 13%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 10%
Student > Master 13 10%
Other 27 21%
Unknown 15 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 88 69%
Environmental Science 13 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 2%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 16 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2023.
All research outputs
#7,547,176
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#1,687
of 4,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,237
of 140,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#7
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,236 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 140,704 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.