You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Bayesian Perceptual Model Replicates the Cutaneous Rabbit and Other Tactile Spatiotemporal Illusions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, March 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0000333 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel Goldreich |
| Abstract |
When brief stimuli contact the skin in rapid succession at two or more locations, perception strikingly shrinks the intervening distance, and expands the elapsed time, between consecutive events. The origins of these perceptual space-time distortions are unknown. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 50% |
| Austria | 2 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Canada | 1 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
| Scientists | 3 | 38% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| Canada | 4 | 2% |
| Germany | 3 | 2% |
| Australia | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| Italy | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 169 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 46 | 24% |
| Researcher | 39 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 32 | 17% |
| Unknown | 24 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 66 | 35% |
| Neuroscience | 27 | 14% |
| Engineering | 20 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 16 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 10% |
| Unknown | 30 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,575,681
of 22,786,691 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#44,324
of 194,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,370
of 76,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#49
of 147 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,691 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,517 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,851 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 147 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.