↓ Skip to main content

Immunoinformatics Comes of Age

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, June 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
228 Mendeley
citeulike
9 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Immunoinformatics Comes of Age
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, June 2006
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020071
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bette Korber, Montiago LaBute, Karina Yusim

Abstract

With the burgeoning immunological data in the scientific literature, scientists must increasingly rely on Internet resources to inform and enhance their work. Here we provide a brief overview of the adaptive immune response and summaries of immunoinformatics resources, emphasizing those with Web interfaces. These resources include searchable databases of epitopes and immune-related molecules, and analysis tools for T cell and B cell epitope prediction, vaccine design, and protein structure comparisons. There is an agreeable synergy between the growing collections in immune-related databases and the growing sophistication of analysis software; the databases provide the foundation for developing predictive computational tools, which in turn enable more rapid identification of immune responses to populate the databases. Collectively, these resources contribute to improved understanding of immune responses and escape, and evolution of pathogens under immune pressure. The public health implications are vast, including designing vaccines, understanding autoimmune diseases, and defining the correlates of immune protection.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 228 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
India 3 1%
Spain 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 207 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 52 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 21%
Student > Master 31 14%
Student > Bachelor 19 8%
Student > Postgraduate 12 5%
Other 34 15%
Unknown 31 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 86 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 30 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 9%
Computer Science 15 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 14 6%
Other 26 11%
Unknown 37 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2023.
All research outputs
#5,447,195
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#4,151
of 8,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,491
of 87,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#8
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 87,841 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.