↓ Skip to main content

Design and Characterization of Topical Formulations: Correlations Between Instrumental and Sensorial Measurements

Overview of attention for article published in AAPS PharmSciTech, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Design and Characterization of Topical Formulations: Correlations Between Instrumental and Sensorial Measurements
Published in
AAPS PharmSciTech, February 2018
DOI 10.1208/s12249-018-0960-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lívia Salomão Calixto, Victor Hugo Pacagnelli Infante, Patrícia M. B. G. Maia Campos

Abstract

The interaction between cosmetic emulsions and the skin's surface is an important factor to consider in the development of topical formulations. Two important ingredients in cosmetic formulations are waxes and polymers. The physical and mechanical properties of formulations directly impact the interface skin-formulation. To evaluate this interaction, it is important to study the rheology, texture, and sensory properties. In this context, the aim of the study was to evaluate the influence of waxes and polymers on the rheological behavior, texture profile, and sensorial properties of topical formulations and the correlation between these parameters. The best combination of a wax and a polymer was determined by full factorial design of experiments and applied to develop eight formulations that were tested in relation to rheological, mechanical, and sensorial properties. The polymer helps with the spreadability of the formulation, and the wax had a strong influence on the parameters related to the structure of emulsions. A correlation between these parameters was observed. This way, it was possible to compare theoretical and practical data, except between the flow index and the work of shear. Finally, it was possible to predict sensorial aspects from rheological and texture parameters, making the formulation process easier and more integrated with all stages of the development of new topical formulations. Thus, the present study introduces a new proposal in the development of cosmetics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 81 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Researcher 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 36 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 21 26%
Chemistry 5 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 6%
Engineering 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 42 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2018.
All research outputs
#13,580,944
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from AAPS PharmSciTech
#875
of 1,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,728
of 331,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AAPS PharmSciTech
#9
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,471 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,055 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.