↓ Skip to main content

Caracterização, beneficiamento e reciclagem de carepas geradas em processos siderúrgicos

Overview of attention for article published in Rem: Revista Escola de Minas, May 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Caracterização, beneficiamento e reciclagem de carepas geradas em processos siderúrgicos
Published in
Rem: Revista Escola de Minas, May 2006
DOI 10.1590/s0370-44672006000100014
Authors

Adriano Ferreira da Cunha, Marcos Paulo Gomes Mol, Máximo Eleotério Martins, Paulo Santos Assis

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2021.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Rem: Revista Escola de Minas
#7
of 55 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,786
of 83,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Rem: Revista Escola de Minas
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 55 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,735 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them