↓ Skip to main content

Transitory microbial habitat in the hyperarid Atacama Desert

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
139 news outlets
blogs
10 blogs
twitter
80 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
170 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
349 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Transitory microbial habitat in the hyperarid Atacama Desert
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, February 2018
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1714341115
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dirk Schulze-Makuch, Dirk Wagner, Samuel P. Kounaves, Kai Mangelsdorf, Kevin G. Devine, Jean-Pierre de Vera, Philippe Schmitt-Kopplin, Hans-Peter Grossart, Victor Parro, Martin Kaupenjohann, Albert Galy, Beate Schneider, Alessandro Airo, Jan Frösler, Alfonso F. Davila, Felix L. Arens, Luis Cáceres, Francisco Solís Cornejo, Daniel Carrizo, Lewis Dartnell, Jocelyne DiRuggiero, Markus Flury, Lars Ganzert, Mark O. Gessner, Peter Grathwohl, Lisa Guan, Jacob Heinz, Matthias Hess, Frank Keppler, Deborah Maus, Christopher P. McKay, Rainer U. Meckenstock, Wren Montgomery, Elizabeth A. Oberlin, Alexander J. Probst, Johan S. Sáenz, Tobias Sattler, Janosch Schirmack, Mark A. Sephton, Michael Schloter, Jenny Uhl, Bernardita Valenzuela, Gisle Vestergaard, Lars Wörmer, Pedro Zamorano

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 80 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 349 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 349 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 66 19%
Researcher 49 14%
Student > Bachelor 40 11%
Student > Master 31 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 7%
Other 65 19%
Unknown 73 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 75 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 57 16%
Environmental Science 31 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 27 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 19 5%
Other 46 13%
Unknown 94 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1214. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2024.
All research outputs
#11,956
of 25,983,475 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#378
of 104,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#225
of 347,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#15
of 1,043 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,983,475 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 104,100 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,193 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,043 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.