You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
An occupational therapy intervention for residents with stroke related disabilities in UK care homes (OTCH): cluster randomised controlled trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
British Medical Journal, February 2015
|
DOI | 10.1136/bmj.h468 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Catherine M Sackley, Marion F Walker, Christopher R Burton, Caroline L Watkins, Jonathan Mant, Andrea K Roalfe, Keith Wheatley, Bart Sheehan, Leslie Sharp, Katie E Stant, Joanna Fletcher-Smith, Kerry Steel, Kate Wilde, Lisa Irvine, Guy Peryer |
Abstract |
To evaluate the clinical efficacy of an established programme of occupational therapy in maintaining functional activity and reducing further health risks from inactivity in care home residents living with stroke sequelae. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 26 | 49% |
Japan | 4 | 8% |
Spain | 4 | 8% |
United States | 2 | 4% |
Canada | 1 | 2% |
Chile | 1 | 2% |
Norway | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 14 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 37 | 70% |
Scientists | 11 | 21% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 423 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 3 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 416 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 66 | 16% |
Student > Master | 61 | 14% |
Researcher | 43 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 20 | 5% |
Other | 71 | 17% |
Unknown | 125 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 91 | 22% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 73 | 17% |
Psychology | 30 | 7% |
Social Sciences | 29 | 7% |
Neuroscience | 15 | 4% |
Other | 43 | 10% |
Unknown | 142 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2023.
All research outputs
#937,671
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#9,790
of 64,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,522
of 360,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#214
of 931 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 64,480 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,816 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 931 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.