↓ Skip to main content

Spatial, road geometric and biotic factors associated with Barn Owl mortality along an interstate highway

Overview of attention for article published in Ibis, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Spatial, road geometric and biotic factors associated with Barn Owl mortality along an interstate highway
Published in
Ibis, May 2018
DOI 10.1111/ibi.12593
Authors

Erin M. Arnold, Steven E. Hanser, Tempe Regan, Jeremy Thompson, Melinda Lowe, Angela Kociolek, James R. Belthoff

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 29%
Student > Master 4 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 24%
Student > Bachelor 2 12%
Other 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 76%
Environmental Science 3 18%
Engineering 1 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2018.
All research outputs
#1,762,661
of 12,830,905 outputs
Outputs from Ibis
#430
of 1,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,347
of 267,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ibis
#21
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,830,905 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,745 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,930 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.