↓ Skip to main content

Three alternatively spliced variants of the gene coding for the human bone morphogenetic protein-1

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Molecular Medicine, January 1998
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
7 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Three alternatively spliced variants of the gene coding for the human bone morphogenetic protein-1
Published in
Journal of Molecular Medicine, January 1998
DOI 10.1007/s001090050202
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michal Janitz, Volker Heiser, U. Böttcher, Olfert Landt, R. Lauster

Abstract

The human bone morphogenetic protein-1 was originally identified as a protein with the capacity to stimulate bone and cartilage growth in vitro. Its gene sequence identified it as an alternatively spliced human homolog of the Drosophila dorsal-ventral patterning tolloid gene and suggested that it activates transforming growth factor-beta-like molecules by proteolytic cleavage. Its expression pattern and its recently identified activity as a procollagen C proteinase, however, suggest that it has a more general function in the early stages of embryogenesis. This view is strengthened by the previous observation of a third alternatively spliced isoform of the gene, called bone morphogenetic protein 1/His. We now show that the gene is expressed in three additional variants, leading to shorter and slightly modified C-termini. The three variants are preferentially expressed in placenta but show individual differences in their expression profiles in other soft tissues.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 36%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 18%
Unknown 3 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 55%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 27%
Unknown 2 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2019.
All research outputs
#2,863,852
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Medicine
#103
of 2,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,925
of 94,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Medicine
#1
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,808 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.