↓ Skip to main content

Non-Abelian gauge field optics

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
Non-Abelian gauge field optics
Published in
Nature Communications, July 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41467-019-10974-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuntian Chen, Ruo-Yang Zhang, Zhongfei Xiong, Zhi Hong Hang, Jensen Li, Jian Qi Shen, C. T. Chan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 23%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 18%
Student > Master 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 4 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 24 62%
Engineering 4 10%
Chemistry 1 3%
Materials Science 1 3%
Philosophy 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2020.
All research outputs
#9,584,780
of 15,124,181 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#24,599
of 28,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,620
of 276,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,124,181 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 28,453 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 48.5. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,075 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them