↓ Skip to main content

Review of HIV in the Caribbean: Significant Progress and Outstanding Challenges

Overview of attention for article published in Current HIV/AIDS Reports, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Review of HIV in the Caribbean: Significant Progress and Outstanding Challenges
Published in
Current HIV/AIDS Reports, March 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11904-014-0199-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. Peter Figueroa

Abstract

This paper reviews the recent literature on HIV in the Caribbean and discusses the challenges faced. HIV incidence in the Caribbean has declined by 49 % in the past decade, coverage of persons living with HIV among those eligible for antiretroviral treatment as per national guidelines was 70 % in 2012, and some countries are meeting the target of virtual elimination of mother-to-child transmission. HIV prevalence in the Caribbean is 1 % with features of both a generalized and concentrated HIV epidemic. HIV prevalence among female sex workers has declined but remains unacceptably high among men who have sex with men. Social and cultural factors, gender norms, and strong stigma associated with HIV and homosexuality contribute to the continued spread of HIV. Caribbean countries and their partners have invested significant resources, creative effort and impressive research in strengthening the HIV response nationally and regionally. However, in order to control the HIV epidemic, leaders at all levels, and the people, must address fundamental structural barriers in society that deny marginalized persons their rights, undermine public health goals, and impede universal access to HIV prevention, treatment, and care.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 139 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 29 21%
Student > Master 18 13%
Researcher 14 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 9%
Student > Bachelor 9 6%
Other 29 21%
Unknown 28 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 29 21%
Social Sciences 23 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 16%
Psychology 12 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 8%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 33 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2021.
All research outputs
#4,696,232
of 22,786,691 outputs
Outputs from Current HIV/AIDS Reports
#107
of 429 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,756
of 221,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current HIV/AIDS Reports
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,691 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 429 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,308 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.