↓ Skip to main content

図書の索引作成の現状 -編集者と著者への調査結果から-

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Information Science & Technology Association/Joho no Kagaku to Gijutsu, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
図書の索引作成の現状 -編集者と著者への調査結果から-
Published in
Journal of Information Science & Technology Association/Joho no Kagaku to Gijutsu, March 2018
DOI 10.18919/jkg.68.3_135
Authors

藤田 節子

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2021.
All research outputs
#7,114,611
of 25,701,027 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Information Science & Technology Association/Joho no Kagaku to Gijutsu
#65
of 1,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,395
of 345,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Information Science & Technology Association/Joho no Kagaku to Gijutsu
#2
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,701,027 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,232 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,830 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.