↓ Skip to main content

Genetic evidence for separation of two sharks,Carcharhinus limbatus andC. tilstoni, from Northern Australia

Overview of attention for article published in Marine Biology, February 1991
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genetic evidence for separation of two sharks,Carcharhinus limbatus andC. tilstoni, from Northern Australia
Published in
Marine Biology, February 1991
DOI 10.1007/bf01313464
Authors

S. Lavery, J. B. Shaklee

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 3%
Unknown 29 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 27%
Student > Bachelor 5 17%
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Postgraduate 3 10%
Student > Master 2 7%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 3 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 67%
Environmental Science 3 10%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2014.
All research outputs
#7,453,479
of 22,786,691 outputs
Outputs from Marine Biology
#1,239
of 3,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,967
of 59,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Biology
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,312 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,213 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.