↓ Skip to main content

Hands‐on therapy interventions for upper limb motor dysfunction following stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
244 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hands‐on therapy interventions for upper limb motor dysfunction following stroke
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006609.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jackie Winter, Susan Hunter, Julius Sim, Peter Crome

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 244 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 238 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 41 17%
Student > Master 40 16%
Researcher 23 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 9%
Other 13 5%
Other 43 18%
Unknown 62 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 44 18%
Social Sciences 13 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 4%
Neuroscience 8 3%
Other 30 12%
Unknown 75 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2019.
All research outputs
#8,242,887
of 25,391,066 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,401
of 12,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,802
of 124,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#68
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,391,066 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,640 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.8. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,879 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.