↓ Skip to main content

Cancer screening recommendations: an international comparison of high income countries

Overview of attention for article published in Public Health Reviews, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#38 of 279)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
32 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
133 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
185 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cancer screening recommendations: an international comparison of high income countries
Published in
Public Health Reviews, March 2018
DOI 10.1186/s40985-018-0080-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark H. Ebell, Thuy Nhu Thai, Kyle J. Royalty

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 185 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 24 13%
Student > Master 19 10%
Researcher 16 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 6%
Other 32 17%
Unknown 69 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 19 10%
Unknown 75 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,473,087
of 25,582,611 outputs
Outputs from Public Health Reviews
#38
of 279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,002
of 346,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Public Health Reviews
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,582,611 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 279 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,669 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.