| Title |
Cancer screening recommendations: an international comparison of high income countries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Public Health Reviews, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40985-018-0080-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mark H. Ebell, Thuy Nhu Thai, Kyle J. Royalty |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 16% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 13% |
| France | 2 | 6% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 3% |
| Peru | 1 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| Finland | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 22% |
| Scientists | 5 | 16% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 188 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 10% |
| Researcher | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 33 | 18% |
| Unknown | 69 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 59 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 20 | 11% |
| Unknown | 75 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,474,927
of 25,805,386 outputs
Outputs from Public Health Reviews
#40
of 283 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,827
of 347,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Public Health Reviews
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,805,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 283 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,407 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.