↓ Skip to main content

Feeding ecology of the large grey babblerTurdoides malcolmi

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings: Animal Sciences, July 1986
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Feeding ecology of the large grey babblerTurdoides malcolmi
Published in
Proceedings: Animal Sciences, July 1986
DOI 10.1007/bf03179379
Authors

H S Toor, Manjit S Saini

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 50%
Student > Master 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2021.
All research outputs
#7,404,662
of 22,641,687 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings: Animal Sciences
#2
of 25 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,899
of 10,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings: Animal Sciences
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,641,687 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one scored the same or higher as 23 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 10,543 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them