↓ Skip to main content

How long would it take to become a giant squid?

Overview of attention for article published in Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, February 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How long would it take to become a giant squid?
Published in
Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, February 2007
DOI 10.1007/s11160-007-9046-x
Authors

Eric P. M. Grist, George D. Jackson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 2 3%
Namibia 1 1%
Argentina 1 1%
Unknown 64 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 24%
Student > Bachelor 13 19%
Other 7 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Student > Master 6 9%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 7 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 63%
Environmental Science 6 9%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Unspecified 1 1%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 10 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2018.
All research outputs
#7,942,395
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#353
of 596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,158
of 77,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 596 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 77,855 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.