↓ Skip to main content

RANKL/RANK—beyond bones

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Molecular Medicine, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
116 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
141 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
RANKL/RANK—beyond bones
Published in
Journal of Molecular Medicine, March 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00109-011-0749-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Reiko Hanada, Toshikatsu Hanada, Verena Sigl, Daniel Schramek, Josef M. Penninger

Abstract

Receptor-activator of NF-κB ligand (TNFSF11, also known as RANKL, OPGL, TRANCE, and ODF) and its tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-family receptor RANK are essential regulators of bone remodeling, lymph node formation, establishment of the thymic microenvironment, mammary gland development during pregnancy, and bone metastasis in cancer. We have recently also reported that the RANKL/RANK system controls the incidence and onset of sex hormone, progestin-driven breast cancer. RANKL and RANK are also expressed in the central nervous systems where they play an essential role in body temperature regulation. RANKL activates brain regions involved in thermoregulation and induces fever via the COX2-PGE(2)/EP3R pathway. Moreover, female mice with a RANK gene deleted in neurons and astrocytes exhibit increased basal body temperature, suggesting that the RANKL/RANK system also controls physiological thermoregulation in females under the control of sex hormones. This review will summarize the recently emerging role of the RANKL/RANK signaling axis in mammary gland development, cancer metastasis, hormone-derived breast cancer development, and thermal regulation. Furthermore, we will highlight the striking therapeutic potential of this pathway and provide a molecular rationale for consideration of targeting RANKL/RANK in diseases such as breast cancer.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 138 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 21%
Researcher 24 17%
Student > Bachelor 20 14%
Student > Master 11 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 18 13%
Unknown 30 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 27 19%
Neuroscience 5 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 2%
Other 17 12%
Unknown 29 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2015.
All research outputs
#7,453,479
of 22,786,691 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Medicine
#504
of 1,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,825
of 108,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Medicine
#8
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,551 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,920 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.