↓ Skip to main content

An evaluation of dual-process theories of reasoning

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, December 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
328 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
484 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An evaluation of dual-process theories of reasoning
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, December 2004
DOI 10.3758/bf03196730
Pubmed ID
Authors

Magda Osman

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 484 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 7 1%
Germany 6 1%
United States 5 1%
France 2 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Other 8 2%
Unknown 451 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 114 24%
Student > Master 75 15%
Researcher 63 13%
Student > Bachelor 60 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 5%
Other 94 19%
Unknown 52 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 209 43%
Business, Management and Accounting 38 8%
Social Sciences 35 7%
Philosophy 26 5%
Computer Science 21 4%
Other 85 18%
Unknown 70 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2023.
All research outputs
#8,783,469
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
#4
of 6 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,582
of 153,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one scored the same or higher as 2 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 153,916 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.