↓ Skip to main content

Molecular phylogeny and spore evolution of Entolomataceae

Overview of attention for article published in Persoonia - Molecular Phylogeny and Evolution of Fungi, November 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#47 of 218)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
wikipedia
21 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
95 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Molecular phylogeny and spore evolution of Entolomataceae
Published in
Persoonia - Molecular Phylogeny and Evolution of Fungi, November 2009
DOI 10.3767/003158509x480944
Pubmed ID
Authors

D. Co-David, D. Langeveld, M.E. Noordeloos

Abstract

The phylogeny of the Entolomataceae was reconstructed using three loci (RPB2, LSU and mtSSU) and, in conjunction with spore morphology (using SEM and TEM), was used to address four main systematic issues: 1) the monophyly of the Entolomataceae; 2) inter-generic relationships within the Entolomataceae; 3) genus delimitation of Entolomataceae; and 4) spore evolution in the Entolomataceae. Results confirm that the Entolomataceae (Entoloma, Rhodocybe, Clitopilus, Richoniella and Rhodogaster) is monophyletic and that the combination of pinkish spore prints and spores having bumps and/or ridges formed by an epicorium is a synapomorphy for the family. The Entolomataceae is made up of two sister clades: one with Clitopilus nested within Rhodocybe and another with Richoniella and Rhodogaster nested within Entoloma. Entoloma is best retained as one genus. The smaller genera within Entoloma s.l. are either polyphyletic or make other genera paraphyletic. Spores of the clitopiloid type are derived from rhodocyboid spores. The ancestral spore type of the Entolomataceae was either rhodocyboid or entolomatoid. Taxonomic and nomenclatural changes are made including merging Rhodocybe into Clitopilus and transferring relevant species into Clitopilus and Entoloma.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 2 3%
Germany 1 1%
Hungary 1 1%
Ecuador 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 69 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 22%
Researcher 17 22%
Student > Master 11 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Postgraduate 4 5%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 12 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 49 63%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 10%
Environmental Science 5 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 3%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 13 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2024.
All research outputs
#4,180,216
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Persoonia - Molecular Phylogeny and Evolution of Fungi
#47
of 218 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,313
of 178,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Persoonia - Molecular Phylogeny and Evolution of Fungi
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 218 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,372 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them