↓ Skip to main content

A Probabilistic Model of RNA Conformational Space

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, June 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
92 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
citeulike
10 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Probabilistic Model of RNA Conformational Space
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, June 2009
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000406
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jes Frellsen, Ida Moltke, Martin Thiim, Kanti V. Mardia, Jesper Ferkinghoff-Borg, Thomas Hamelryck

Abstract

The increasing importance of non-coding RNA in biology and medicine has led to a growing interest in the problem of RNA 3-D structure prediction. As is the case for proteins, RNA 3-D structure prediction methods require two key ingredients: an accurate energy function and a conformational sampling procedure. Both are only partly solved problems. Here, we focus on the problem of conformational sampling. The current state of the art solution is based on fragment assembly methods, which construct plausible conformations by stringing together short fragments obtained from experimental structures. However, the discrete nature of the fragments necessitates the use of carefully tuned, unphysical energy functions, and their non-probabilistic nature impairs unbiased sampling. We offer a solution to the sampling problem that removes these important limitations: a probabilistic model of RNA structure that allows efficient sampling of RNA conformations in continuous space, and with associated probabilities. We show that the model captures several key features of RNA structure, such as its rotameric nature and the distribution of the helix lengths. Furthermore, the model readily generates native-like 3-D conformations for 9 out of 10 test structures, solely using coarse-grained base-pairing information. In conclusion, the method provides a theoretical and practical solution for a major bottleneck on the way to routine prediction and simulation of RNA structure and dynamics in atomic detail.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 5%
United Kingdom 3 3%
Germany 2 2%
Canada 2 2%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 95 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 27%
Researcher 30 27%
Student > Master 11 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 9%
Professor 6 5%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 8 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 19%
Computer Science 15 14%
Chemistry 11 10%
Physics and Astronomy 6 5%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 9 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2010.
All research outputs
#8,616,072
of 25,576,801 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#5,665
of 9,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,438
of 122,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#27
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,801 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,975 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.