↓ Skip to main content

Zingiber zerumbet (L.) Smith: A Review of Its Ethnomedicinal, Chemical, and Pharmacological Uses

Overview of attention for article published in Evidence-based Complementary & Alternative Medicine (eCAM), March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
149 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
381 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Zingiber zerumbet (L.) Smith: A Review of Its Ethnomedicinal, Chemical, and Pharmacological Uses
Published in
Evidence-based Complementary & Alternative Medicine (eCAM), March 2011
DOI 10.1155/2011/543216
Pubmed ID
Authors

N. J. Yob, S. Mohd. Jofrry, M. M. R. Meor. Mohd. Affandi, L. K. Teh, M. Z. Salleh, Z. A. Zakaria

Abstract

Zingiber zerumbet Sm., locally known to the Malay as "Lempoyang," is a perennial herb found in many tropical countries, including Malaysia. The rhizomes of Z. zerumbet, particularly, have been regularly used as food flavouring and appetizer in various Malays' cuisines while the rhizomes extracts have been used in Malay traditional medicine to treat various types of ailments (e.g., inflammatory- and pain-mediated diseases, worm infestation and diarrhea). Research carried out using different in vitro and in vivo assays of biological evaluation support most of these claims. The active pharmacological component of Z. zerumbet rhizomes most widely studied is zerumbone. This paper presents the botany, traditional uses, chemistry, and pharmacology of this medicinal plant.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 381 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 375 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 63 17%
Student > Master 48 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 11%
Researcher 24 6%
Lecturer 21 6%
Other 42 11%
Unknown 141 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 63 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 40 10%
Chemistry 28 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 27 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 7%
Other 48 13%
Unknown 148 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2017.
All research outputs
#3,920,491
of 25,978,998 outputs
Outputs from Evidence-based Complementary & Alternative Medicine (eCAM)
#1,307
of 9,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,299
of 120,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Evidence-based Complementary & Alternative Medicine (eCAM)
#29
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,978,998 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,364 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,908 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.