↓ Skip to main content

The impact of body mass index on quantitative 24-h urine chemistries in stone forming patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Urolithiasis, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The impact of body mass index on quantitative 24-h urine chemistries in stone forming patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Urolithiasis, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00240-018-1044-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Qing Wang, Weijie Hu, Yuchao Lu, Henglong Hu, Jiaqiao Zhang, Shaogang Wang

Abstract

To study the impact of body mass index (BMI) on quantitative 24-h urine chemistries in stone forming patients and to explore how overweight and obesity contribute to urolithiasis. A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was performed in July 2017 and updated in October 2017 to detect relevant studies. After that, we screened all the relevant articles in accordance with the predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data of eligible studies were extracted, and then, a meta-analysis was conducted via RevMan 5.3 software. Nine studies, involving 5965 stone forming patients who underwent 24-h urine collection for chemistry analysis, were included in our analysis. BMI was used to clarify the body size. BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 group, including overweight and obesity patients, erected more calcium (WMD 34.44 mg; 95% CI 11.33-57.55; p = 0.003), oxalate (WMD 3.44 mg; 95% CI 1.40-5.49; p = 0.001), urate (WMD 97.71 mg; 95% CI 63.05-132.38; p < 0.00001), and sodium (WMD 26.64 mg; 95% CI 18.23-35.05; p < 0.00001) in 24 h than BMI < 25 kg/m2 group. However, the BMI < 25 kg/m2 group showed higher pH of urine (WMD 0.12; 95% CI 0.04-0.20; p = 0.004). There was no significant difference in 24-h urine volume (WMD - 29.30 ml; 95% CI - 122.03 to - 63.42; p = 0.54), citrate (WMD - 34.03 mg; 95% CI - 72.88 to 4.82; p = 0.09), magnesium (WMD - 4.50 mg; 95% CI - 10.48 to 1.48; p = 0.14), phosphate (WMD - 89.38 mg; 95% CI - 219.23 to 40.47; p = 0.18), and creatinine (WMD - 191.98 mg; 95% CI - 395.35 to 11.38; p = 0.06) between the two groups. All the results kept the same tendency when gender was taken in consideration. Sensitivity analysis generated similar results. The current evidence suggested that patients with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 erected more promotions but not inhibitors of urolithiasis than those with BMI < 25 kg/m2, which increased the risk of urolithiasis in overweight and obesity individuals.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 26%
Researcher 4 21%
Professor 2 11%
Other 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 4 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 21%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Sports and Recreations 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 5 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2019.
All research outputs
#14,378,457
of 23,026,672 outputs
Outputs from Urolithiasis
#193
of 331 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#240,406
of 439,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Urolithiasis
#6
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,026,672 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 331 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,457 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.