↓ Skip to main content

Validation of a 10-gene molecular signature for predicting biochemical recurrence and clinical metastasis in localized prostate cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
patent
2 patents

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Validation of a 10-gene molecular signature for predicting biochemical recurrence and clinical metastasis in localized prostate cancer
Published in
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00432-018-2615-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hatem Abou-Ouf, Mohammed Alshalalfa, Mandeep Takhar, Nicholas Erho, Bryan Donnelly, Elai Davicioni, R. Jeffrey Karnes, Tarek A. Bismar

Abstract

To validate a previously characterized 10-gene signature in prostate cancer with implication to distinguish aggressive and indolent disease within low and intermediate patients' risk groups. A case-control study design used to select 545 patients from the Mayo clinic tumor registry who underwent radical prostatectomy. A training set from this cohort (n = 359) was used to build a 10-gene model, based on high-dimensional discriminant analysis (HDDA10) to predict several endpoints of clinical patients' outcome. An independent set (n = 219) from the same institution was used as validation set. HDDA10 showed significant performance for predicting metastasis (Mets) (AUC 0.68, p = 6.4E - 6) and biochemical recurrence (BCR) (AUC = 0.65, p = 0.003) in the validation set outperforming Gleason grade grouping (GG) for BCR (AUC 0.57, p = 0.03) and with comparable performance for Mets endpoint (GG AUC 0.66, p = 8.1E - 5). HDDA10 prognostic significance was superior to any clinical-pathological parameter within GG2 + 3 (GS7) patients achieving an AUC of 0.74 (p = 0.0037) for BCR compared to Gleason pattern 4 (AUC 0.64) (p = 0.015) and AUC for Mets of 0.68 versus AUC of 0.65 for Gleason pattern 4 (p = 0.01). HDDA10 remained significant for both BCR and Mets in multivariate analysis, suggesting that it can be used to increase accuracy in stratifying patients eligible for active surveillance. HDDA10 is of added value to GG and other clinical-pathological parameters in predicting BCR and Mets endpoint, especially in the low to intermediate patients' risk groups. HDDA10 prognostic value should be further validated prospectively in stratifying patients specifically in low to intermediate GS (GG1-2), such as active surveillance programs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 18%
Lecturer 2 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Student > Master 2 9%
Other 4 18%
Unknown 4 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 9%
Computer Science 2 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 7 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2023.
All research outputs
#3,404,288
of 24,682,395 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
#120
of 2,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,043
of 337,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
#4
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,682,395 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,768 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,029 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.