↓ Skip to main content

ISCB Honors Michael S. Waterman and Mathieu Blanchette

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, August 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
11 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ISCB Honors Michael S. Waterman and Mathieu Blanchette
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, August 2006
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020105
Authors

Merry Maisel

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 67%
Professor 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 3 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2023.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#5,638
of 8,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,185
of 91,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#14
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,935 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.