↓ Skip to main content

An interpretable framework for clustering single-cell RNA-Seq datasets

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An interpretable framework for clustering single-cell RNA-Seq datasets
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, March 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12859-018-2092-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jesse M. Zhang, Jue Fan, H. Christina Fan, David Rosenfeld, David N. Tse

Abstract

With the recent proliferation of single-cell RNA-Seq experiments, several methods have been developed for unsupervised analysis of the resulting datasets. These methods often rely on unintuitive hyperparameters and do not explicitly address the subjectivity associated with clustering. In this work, we present DendroSplit, an interpretable framework for analyzing single-cell RNA-Seq datasets that addresses both the clustering interpretability and clustering subjectivity issues. DendroSplit offers a novel perspective on the single-cell RNA-Seq clustering problem motivated by the definition of "cell type", allowing us to cluster using feature selection to uncover multiple levels of biologically meaningful populations in the data. We analyze several landmark single-cell datasets, demonstrating both the method's efficacy and computational efficiency. DendroSplit offers a clustering framework that is comparable to existing methods in terms of accuracy and speed but is novel in its emphasis on interpretabilty. We provide the full DendroSplit software package at https://github.com/jessemzhang/dendrosplit .

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 110 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 27%
Researcher 17 15%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Student > Master 8 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 31 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 30 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 16%
Computer Science 12 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 4%
Engineering 4 4%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 32 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2019.
All research outputs
#4,191,027
of 25,116,143 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#1,466
of 7,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,774
of 338,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#26
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,116,143 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,653 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,364 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.