You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Neural correlates of encoding and expression in implicit sequence learning
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Experimental Brain Research, June 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00221-005-2284-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
R. D. Seidler, A. Purushotham, S-G. Kim, K. Ugurbil, D. Willingham, J. Ashe |
| Abstract |
In the domain of motor learning it has been difficult to separate the neural substrate of encoding from that of change in performance. Consequently, it has not been clear whether motor effector areas participate in learning or merely modulate changes in performance. Here, using a variant of the serial reaction time task that dissociated these two factors, we report that encoding during procedural motor learning does engage cortical motor areas and can be characterized by distinct early and late encoding phases. The highest correlation between activation and subsequent changes in motor performance was seen in the motor cortex during early encoding, and in the basal ganglia during the late encoding phase. Our results show that rapid encoding during procedural motor learning involves several distinct processes, and is represented primarily within motor system structures. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 3% |
| Canada | 3 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 134 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 25% |
| Researcher | 31 | 21% |
| Professor | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 25 | 17% |
| Unknown | 18 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 43 | 30% |
| Neuroscience | 24 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 12% |
| Sports and Recreations | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 10% |
| Unknown | 22 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2011.
All research outputs
#7,453,827
of 22,787,797 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Brain Research
#900
of 3,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,078
of 56,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Brain Research
#5
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,787,797 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,223 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 56,630 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.