↓ Skip to main content

Lifelong Learning for Clinical Practice: How to Leverage Technology for Telebehavioral Health Care and Digital Continuing Medical Education

Overview of attention for article published in Current Psychiatry Reports, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Lifelong Learning for Clinical Practice: How to Leverage Technology for Telebehavioral Health Care and Digital Continuing Medical Education
Published in
Current Psychiatry Reports, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11920-018-0878-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Donald M. Hilty, Carolyn Turvey, Tiffany Hwang

Abstract

Psychiatric practice continues to evolve and play an important role in patients' lives, the field of medicine, and health care delivery. Clinicians must learn a variety of clinical care systems and lifelong learning (LLL) is crucial to apply knowledge, develop skills, and adjust attitudes. Technology is rapidly becoming a key player-in delivery, lifelong learning, and education/training. The evidence base for telepsychiatry/telemental health via videoconferencing has been growing for three decades, but a greater array of technologies have emerged in the last decade (e.g., social media/networking, text, apps). Clinicians are combining telepsychiatry and these technologies frequently and they need to reflect on, learn more about, and develop skills for these technologies. The digital age has solidified the role of technology in continuing medical education and day-to-day practice. Other fields of medicine are also adapting to the digital age, as are graduate and undergraduate medical education and many allied mental health organizations. In the future, there will be more online training, simulation, and/or interactive electronic examinations, perhaps on a monthly cycle rather than a quasi-annual or 10-year cycle of recertification.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 106 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 13%
Student > Bachelor 13 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 8%
Researcher 6 6%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Other 20 19%
Unknown 38 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 11%
Psychology 10 9%
Computer Science 7 7%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 40 38%