↓ Skip to main content

Cutting with both arms of the scissors: the economic and political case for restrictive supply-side climate policies

Overview of attention for article published in Climatic Change, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#24 of 6,068)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
24 news outlets
blogs
9 blogs
policy
6 policy sources
twitter
478 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
129 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
269 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cutting with both arms of the scissors: the economic and political case for restrictive supply-side climate policies
Published in
Climatic Change, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10584-018-2162-x
Authors

Fergus Green, Richard Denniss

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 478 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 269 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 269 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 42 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 12%
Student > Master 29 11%
Student > Bachelor 18 7%
Lecturer 15 6%
Other 45 17%
Unknown 87 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 41 15%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 27 10%
Environmental Science 26 10%
Engineering 15 6%
Energy 14 5%
Other 49 18%
Unknown 97 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 589. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2024.
All research outputs
#40,150
of 25,795,662 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#24
of 6,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#925
of 351,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#2
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,795,662 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,068 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,683 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.